Washington s Farewell Address Analysis - 1375 Words

Washington’s Farewell Address Analysis Jennifer Trammell GOVT 200 – C04 Instructor Barber Opening statement Washington’s Farewell Address The major document we will be analyzing in this paper is George Washington’s â€Å"Farewell Address†. This was a very important document of its time and in order to analyze it fully it would be helpful to know a little more insight on the writing of and the reason it was written. Who is George Washington? George Washington was born in 1732, he grew up in Virginia and was the son of wealthy tobacco planters. He acquired his extensive military background when he fought for the British during the French and Indian War of 1754-1763. (Ravitch, 1992) After resigning from the army in 1783 when peace†¦show more content†¦Hamilton was asked to remove any bitterness or sadness from the address that the president had tried to pen himself. â€Å"The original plan and core ideas were Washington s, but Hamilton brought those plans to life. Hamilton introduced some innovations and improvements into Washington s design, but they conformed to Washington s original intentions; and it was Washington who retained final approval of what was included and what was not.† (Malanson, 2014) Though there are many points made in Washington’s â€Å"Farewell Address† there were three that stood out the most to me. Major points of Washington’s â€Å"Farewell Address† Major point #1: National Unity. The point that Washington reflects the most on in his address is that the Unity of Government is â€Å"a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize.† (McClellan, 2000, pg. 535) The general theme thorughout the address is the preservation of the union as a core of the American way of life. It is the next points that are stated in the address to help keep and preserve this unity as a nation, the most important point being a statuesque constutution and measures to endorse good charisma among citizens. â€Å"In the end, Washington’s argument for unionShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Washington s Farewell Address1656 Words   |  7 PagesAn Analysis of Washington’s Farewell Address in the Face of the Modern Era George Washington’s farewell address, published just prior to his retirement from the presidency in the fall of 1796, has long been esteemed as one of the most crucial documents for the original establishment of American policy in many areas. From setting a precedent for American neutrality during international wars to promoting the stewardship of public credit, Washington’s address has had a great influence on the paths thatRead MoreWashington s Farewell Address Analysis976 Words   |  4 PagesWashington’s Farewell Address On September 19, 1796, first President of the United States of America - George Washington - wrote a letter commonly known as Farewell Address, which was published in a Philadelphia’s newspaper called American Daily Advertiser for every citizen to read it – nine years after the signing of the Constitution. This open letter was actually drafted and prepared in 1792, when Washington was planning to retire after working a single term in office; but after his Secretary ofRead MoreAnalysis Of George Washington s Farewell Address954 Words   |  4 PagesThe document, George Washington, Farewell Address, was a letter written to the citizens of the United States of America. It allowed outgoing President Washington to give advice on how to maintain the nation after he was gone. He advised our politicians to act in good faith towards all nations and to make an effort to keep peace with other countries. He cautioned to remain connected to God, maintain high moral principles an d to set a good example, one that is guided by a sense of justice and kindnessRead MoreAnalysis Of George Washington s Farewell Address1009 Words   |  5 PagesProblem: In 1789 George Washington’s Farewell Address contained one major piece of advice to the county regarding relations with other nations: â€Å"avoid entangling alliances.† Those words shaped United States foreign policy for more than a century (Policy Making, American Government). Today some Americans think that Washington’s words are still wise ones, and that the United States (U.S.) should withdraw from world affairs whenever possible. In truth, however, the United States has been embroiledRead MoreGeorge Washington s Farewell Address Essay1258 Words   |  6 PagesChase Williams US History to 1865 Dr. Lisa Crutchfield October 14, 2015 George Washington s Farewell Address, Primary Source Analysis George Washington’s Presidential Farewell Address consisted of three critical elements that were considered vital for the functional survival of the country that had just won its independence. On September 19, 1796, President Washington advised the nation to stand together as one united country, warned the people about the dangers of political parties and heRead MoreGeorge Washington s Farewell Address Essay1884 Words   |  8 Pagesthat George Washington gave his â€Å"Farewell Address.† This profoundly important message is still read each year in the Senate. On September 19, 1796, US President George Washington published his Farewell Address to the nation of citizens. It was a thoroughly thoughtful analysis of our new nation, its needs for the future and his plans to decline to seek a third term as president. It was not delivered as a speech, but rather published in many newspapers and public venues. George Washington announcedRead MoreRhetorical Analysis: Rhetorical Analysis:1723 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ Rhetorical Analysis: President Ronald Reagan s Farwell Address Rhetorical Analysis: Reagan s Farwell Address Ronald Reagan s Farewell Address was an amazing example of conveying the fundamentals for freedom through an emotional and visual lesson. It is no wonder that the president known as the great communicator was successful in painting for us a picture of who we were, past and present, and the improvements in the areas of strength, securityRead MoreEvaluating Historical Views of Leadership Essay1194 Words   |  5 Pageshigh ground is the most important weapon in breaking the will of the enemy (Stallard, 2013). Sun Tzu (1994) in his work, The Art of War, began his discussion with the value of the moral law (as cited in Stallard, 2013). George Washington (1796) stated in his farewell address as President that religion and morality are indispensable in supporting patriotism (as cited in Stallard, 2013). The guiding principle of military leadership is the respect for human dignity (Mann, 2000). Military leadershipRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Reagan s Farewell Address Essay1 767 Words   |  8 PagesFarewells and Fair-Warnings A Rhetorical Analysis of Ronald Reagan’s Farewell Address Introduction to Analysis On January 11, 1989, President Ronald Reagan sat at his desk in the Oval Office to address his nation for the final time. This rhetorical moment was not the first of its kind. Rather, the Farewell Address is a Presidential tradition, started by George Washington, that every president takes part in before leaving office. As a sort of â€Å"goodbye† to the nation, the President discusses the accomplishmentsRead More Analysis of Johnsons The Great Society Essay679 Words   |  3 PagesAnalysis of Johnsons The Great Society The Great Society, a program created by president Johnson in the 1960s with the intent of social and economic stabilization, brought much reform to the American Government and its citizens. It is a continuation and expansion of the ideas expressed in Roosevelts New Deal with the intentions of not only providing greater welfare but also equality of all races in all aspects of society. Although there were many accomplishments by the program, it is

Leaders Free Essays

Does the quest for power and wealth, which led to centuries of violent guest and subjugation of city? States and empire during ancient times, continue to happen at present times? – Leaders, presidents, barraging captains, a ruler off place, and others have this ranks getting better and better. For this instance this leaders abuse their power to people to feel that they are strong and they have power, but they are not and they do not have any power. Some leaders are going to be violent because some people do not follow them so they would get mad. We will write a custom essay sample on Leaders or any similar topic only for you Order Now Ferdinand E. Marco’s, he is en of the presidents that he thinks that he can rule over the people. The people, that time, does not have any rights to talk, they do not have any freedom. Yes, he is very smart, and made our country a better country, but that was the problem, he did not give any freedom to the people. Money changes people. There are these people who uses their money for them instead help the community. Let us use President Gloria MacDougal Arroyo as an example, instead of using the money or donating the money for the people she used the money of the people for her body and face. If you re wondering what my answer is, it’s a yes. Leaders wanted power and wealth. It led violent guest and subjugation of the city. Every year or every time they change the leader they have these laws or rules that you should follow whether you like or not. Leaders want to execute people who disobey them. Being a leader those not mean you have to have all the power and money It Is all about being smart, how good you are in helping people, you are ready for the challenges, you have to give what the people want, and you have to give them the people’s rights. That is when the leaders darted doing right things. They gave us freedom, and rights. Other countries helped us with the wars and with the Spaniards who are punishing us for no reason and used us as slaves. These leaders feel that they are higher than us, but all of us are the same. This led our country to do things for others because they think that we are low. There are a lot of countries that tricked us. Like the Americans they went to the Philippines to use our lands but the Filipinos thinks that time that they are going to help us but they did not do anything. The American people tricked us. Then the Filipino people had enough. That Is how we, Filipinos started fighting and we started defending there selves. We stared creating our own rules, our own laws, governments, and policies. That time other people does not have any right to rule us but the ones that can rule us Is the people that can take care of us and can listen to the people problem. These kinds of presidents brought us to stay strong and fight for our country and us. We started as a ruined group of people but we are building walls behind us to make us strong and to tell people that If they mess with us they mess with the wrong people. Until now there are still presidents, not only presidents but also senators or mayors that use the money of the people, but we know that one day we can be a better country. By bulls_babe you have to have all the power and money it is all about being smart, how good you Filipino people had enough. That is how we, Filipinos started fighting and we started but the ones that can rule us is the people that can take care of us and can listen to the people problem. These kinds of presidents brought us to stay strong and fight for behind us to make us strong and to tell people that if they mess with us they mess How to cite Leaders, Papers

Mercantilist and Modern Use of Tariffs free essay sample

Mercantilism held tariffs in high favor for the reduced competition and monopolies, whereas modern economists disputed this in favor of a hands-off approach of free trade. Through the centuries and schools of thought, beliefs about tariffs changed and comparisons between how Mercantilism and modern economists will be shown throughout this paper. The Mercantilism concept of high, protective, exclusionary tariffs on imports allows domestic businesses and national economies to enjoy a monopoly without foreign competition.As it is believed in Mercantilism theory, a country loud be financially stronger if they were to rid themselves of foreign competition and they are able to do that by placing high taxes on the goods that are coming into their country from others. By incurring higher taxes and making foreign goods more expensive, a domestic consumer would have an incentive to buy domestic goods since they are cheaper. Although this is how the consumer behaves, a producer would have less incentive to create high quality goods as they do not have any competition. Because they are in a monopoly, they can create sub-par products and expect them to be recessed because that is all the consumer has to decide from. Now that you have seen how the Mercantilisms high tariffs work in theory, lees look at how they have worked in history. During Mercantilism, heavy emphasis was placed on national power. That was their economic goal and their way to achieve it was through maximizing their amount of gold. This was their incentive for expeditions and war as they believed that if they could succeed in this regard, it would be impossible for their nation to suffer.In the sixteenth century, France was one of the strongest countries in Europe. During this time, they adopted policies of mercantilism by restricting imports from Spain for wool and restricting exports of gold. France became a pioneer for protectionism in the seventeenth century as they continued to restrict imports while encouraging exports. France worked to increase commerce and exports by building extensive roads to serve as trade routes. England adopted much of the same principles and was able to become a powerful trading country. They placed heavy tariffs on imports while giving incentives for exports.In an effort to hinder other countries manufacturing industries, they banned the exports f certain raw materials. While the Netherlands was the trading leader of the world until Britain later took that title, they actually did not use many Mercantilism concepts. The Dutch ruthlessly engaged in several wars in the sixteenth century to colonize other parts of the world to improve trade. They fought with France and Portugal to establish overseas trading networks. Instead of using tariff policy to regulate their own well-being, the Dutch were graced with natural geographical benefits that aided their trade supremacy.They were pioneers for overseas trade and were able to take advantage of European waterways, especially the Rhine and Amuse. They invested heavily in ships and shipbuilding and that coupled with their accessibility to waterways allowed them to connect with other nations. They also had the best accessibility to trade with Asia and were able to trade with them more than any other European country. In the middle of the seventeenth century, while other countries were in conflict, Britain saved and waited until their country had the resources to confront other European countries with more advanced mercantilism policies. By the middle of the eighteenth century, high import tariffs and exclusionary policy by the French and British began to hurt the Dutch. The British and French effectively protected their own economies through this aggressive strategy, highlighting how well the tariff policy worked. Although new investment and increases in ports in these two countries would have helped the Dutch, they were excluded from the potential profits. Dutch traders experienced the fiercest competition they had ever seen which forced them to lose their supreme position that they had worked so hard to obtain two centuries earlier.Moving on to the twentieth entry, high tariffs have been seen in modern economies. In the late uses, American automobile manufacturers were trying to get protection through tariffs from Japanese manufacturers. Chrysler, General Motors and Ford all asked for help from the government to remain profitable. The United States government agreed and reached an agreement with Japan that limited the amount of vehicles that could be imported to the US. This worked the same way as tariffs in the way that it increased demand for American made vehicles.When these protective tariffs were set in place, quality in American ears fell while firms raised prices. Without competition, they had reduced incentive to produce better vehicles. Now that you have seen how Mercantilisms theory of high tariffs has been used in the past, lets look at how modern economics free trade works internationally. Free trade occurs when two countries are able to trade goods across each others borders without intervention by the government through import taxes and tariffs or subsidies. Because there are no outside influences on supply and demand, the actual price of the good can be seen for comparison. When woo countries trade with each Other, they can experience mutual gains from specialization in which they are both better off than if they did not trade. There is also opposition to free trade though and the main critique is for protectionism and the nationalistic fears of trade hindering an economy. Now that you have seen some of the theory regarding free trade, lets look at its place through history in modern economies. The concept of free trade was first established by the pioneer of modern economics, Adam Smith.He argued that England should have unregulated foreign trade and highlighted TTS benefits, such as when France can produce a good such as wine more productively than England, whereas England can produce a good such as wine more productively, then they can trade and both countries will be better off. Each country is able to have more of each good than if they were producing both items themselves. There are also increased benefits as labor becomes more specialized. Workers become more efficient and costs are lowered while output increases. Smith criticized the Mercantilism policies which restricted the volume of trade.The Mercantilism looked at the wealth f a nation by the amount of gold that it had whereas Smith insisted that a nations wealth be defined by its flow of goods. While Mercantilism believed trade was a zero-sum game, in which one trader was a winner and one was a loser and that all goods in the world were at a fixed amount, Smith showed how both nations are actually better off because of trade and by doing so, raise the quantity of goods in the world. Problems with free trade can be shown throughout history in the twentieth century. At the start of the 19005, the Aquas per capita income was growing on average 1. Per year and Western Europe was growing at 1. 3% a year while utilizing free trade (Change, p. 27). During the same time, Latin American countries had some of the highest tariffs in the world yet were growing at a similar rate. Later in the 1 sass and 1 sass, while developing Latin American countries were using tariffs and protectionism, they were growing at roughly 3. 0% a year. Throughout the 1 sass when they adopted free trade policy, their growth fell to almost one third of that. While growth slowed down significantly, income inequality rose. One of the main criticisms to free trade s the way in which it spreads the gap between rich and poor. Free trade generally does not make poor people rich but rather makes them poorer. The tariff policies of the Mercantilism and the modern economists could not be any more opposite. While Mercantilism encourage high protecting tariffs on imports, modern economists encourage free trade. Throughout history, both theories have been implemented to a countrys convenience and that can be seen throughout history. Although free trade is a modern concept, the Mercantilism concept of protectionism is still often seen today.